wolfwings: (Default)
[personal profile] wolfwings

I'm seeing one major obstacle to why things like Open Canvas don't take off more:

They require you to use/learn their tools to make art. This is rather a large obstacle to a lot of artists, who find the tools that work best for them, and don't like re-learning things over, and over, and over as times change.

So remove that requirement for the streaming tool to provide any actual art tools itself. What are you left with?

A tool much like join.me, but that server-side remembers a much larger canvas for multiple users, and can somehow broadcast both that large canvas (shrunk somehow?) to read-only viewers, and broadcast overlays (differences if you will) of that meta-canvas versus a given user's local canvas.

Handling conflicts is very difficult, but I'm realizing it may not be required to handle them transparently. Allowing for a simple interface for a given read/write user to pull a clipboard-like snapshot from the master-canvas they can paste into their own canvas would be sufficient I believe. It would allow for cooperative collaboration, not conflicting collaboration, but still allow for the social doodling-beside-each-other aspect.

But the basic idea would be define (with a client akin to Join.Me's) "here is my canvas" and "here are my scroll bars" and then begin streaming, or joining into an existing stream/meta-canvas. First person in defines the overall canvas dimensions, and the meta-stream says what those are right at the top, so new folks joining in know what size canvas to take (meta-canvas sized or smaller) and can tie in.

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Style Credit