wolfwings: (Default)
[personal profile] wolfwings
...due to a discussion I had with a friend about digital car readouts.

Am wondering why everyone seems to use such complicated methods of doing digital tachometers based on wierd, velocity-measuring circuits that seem overly complex... why not just run one cable into the engine compartment, and use an inductive probe to sample one spark-plug wire? Then just hook that 'pulse' up to a delay-circuit such that the first 'pulse' after each timed interval latches the display, the next resets the count. If you want to be really 'precise' and have a smoothly-changing display instead of a once-a-second update, have 10 counters, and 'time out' each one once a second, set out of phase with each other by 1/10th of a second. As long as you adjust the counter circuit based on the number of cylinders in the engine, the approach would work, and be very simple to construct as far as I can tell.

Each counter would require four 555 chips set up for base-10 counting to handle up to 9999 rpms, a static flip-flop bank to 'store' the currently-displayed number, and a four-digit base-10-to-7-segment-LED decoder to actually display the stored number. The 'time out' circuit would be another 555 chip. The only 'complexity' would be making the cyclic-phased reset for 10 of those, but even that's trivial. Just set up a 1/10th of a second 'trigger' that cycles another 555 chip as a base-10 counter, triggering each of the 'time out' sub-circuits in order.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Style Credit