wolfwings: (Default)
[personal profile] wolfwings


Now... many will misunderstand what I mean by posting to this image, and what the shorthand form of the request meant.

This isn't a lashing-out at Diebold, or any of the other, numerous, electronic-voting systems.

This isn't a request that my vote suddenly be trackable.

This is a demand that, if I place a vote with an electronic voting machine, I recieve a reciept that has a single fact it can prove:
What the votes cast for it are.

I don't need to be able to prove who cast the votes on the reciept (though what machine they were cast at could be useful to prevent double-voting attacks), only that the votes on the reciept are valid votes, and what those votes were, both in cleartext and in some form of durable, secure, provable fashion. The latter would likely involve encrypted data using public-key information, to prove that the reciept is valid as a side-effect.

What you bring up is a very valid point.

Date: 2004-04-25 10:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfwings.livejournal.com
And one I should have clarified sooner. I don't want to be able to take my 'vote' home and pin it on the wall. Honestly, I just want a physical, verifiable copy of my vote, to prove there's SOME record of my vote that's visible to the nakey eye. I don't plan to take it anywhere, or at least not the 'only copy' of the vote.

Though against vote-selling... since the votes don't prove who cast them, what's to stop someone from just swapping ballots with someone else to 'prove' how they voted, and swindling the so-called 'purchaser' out of cash? Yeah, you can strongarm someone, but the rubber-hose technique is rather hard to stop even without vote confirmation slips.

Style Credit